Review content and AI changes
Check the current version, proposed edits and approval scope, including conflicting revisions.
Updated
Review content in its original conversation or output preview. The decision should apply to the version you intend to use, not an earlier message approving a different draft.
Open references and verify names, figures, dates and the conditions behind each claim. Then review structure, title and voice. Identify the exact passage and reason when requesting changes.
If only part of a revision is useful, ask to preserve the correct passages and change the rest rather than accepting an unreliable draft wholesale.
Use a diff view when available. If you edited the text while AI was generating, compare the current draft and AI candidate before choosing which to keep. Recheck delivery content after adopting a new version.
Read the target, action and scope. Permission for the current operation does not authorize every future task. Give a reason when declining so that the next attempt can address it.
Chat replies, tool permission, adopting text and publication review can use different controls. Follow the action actually shown. Reopen the conversation to refresh an expired request instead of repeatedly clicking it.
Continue with Delivery.
Q: Which version should I use if I edited the text while AI was generating?
**A: ** Compare the current draft with the candidate and decide what to keep from each before adopting the AI version. Review key facts and attachments afterward.
Q: Can I restore an expired approval by clicking it again?
**A: ** Reopen the conversation to refresh its state and respond to the current valid request. An old card cannot authorize a new action.